Hi, async send is that much faster for the exact reason it doesn't wait for the response from the broker before sending the next message. You can still get exceptions, by using ExceptionListener, but you'll lose guarantees that message is stored in the broker once your send() method return.
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ----------------- FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging. Email: dej...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/dejanb ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Anirudha Khanna <aniru...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When sending messages using persistent mode and useAsyncSend=true, I noticed > that the producer throughput is roughly 10x more as compared to when > useAsyncSend=false. What I am trying to understand is whether it is safe to > use this option if we want to guarantee that all the messages that a producer > sends will be received by the broker. (using TCP as transport) Are there any > caveats to using this option? Will the broker be able to notify the client > say if it was unable to persist the message(s) to the message store? > > Thanks, > Anirudha >
