I am looking into the jgroups and jrms transport protocols listed here:
http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html I am using ActiveMQ 5.4.2.
I tried configuring a jgroups transportConnector as follows:
<transportConnector name="jgroups" uri="jgroups:default" />
This results in an exception and failure at startup:
2011-01-03 15:22:48,560 | ERROR | Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS Message
Broker. Reason: java.io.IOException: Transport Connector could not be
registered in JMX: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jgroups] |
org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService | main
Similarly I tried configuring a jrms transportConnector:
<transportConnector name="jrms" uri="jrms://localhost:5555" />
Then I get this exception and failure at startup:
2011-01-03 15:24:05,345 | ERROR | Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS Message
Broker. Reason: java.io.IOException: Transport Connector could not be
registered in JMX: Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms] |
org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService | main
java.io.IOException: Transport Connector could not be registered in JMX:
Transport scheme NOT recognized: [jrms]
I found a note from James Strachan saying the JGroups transport is not
present in ActiveMQ due to licensing problems:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/200702.mbox/%3cec6e67fd0702120140k79445f80u5af3927c547d...@mail.gmail.com%3e
I haven't been able to find a similar post about jrms, but I don't see any
references to jrms in trunk, so I'm guessing this code has also been removed
(or never really existed?).
Should jgroups and jrms be removed from the transport connector
documentation to avoid confusion? The main activemq.apache.org page claims
ActiveMQ supports jgroups - this seems a bit misleading.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/jgroups-and-jrms-transports-do-not-really-exist-tp3175670p3175670.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
