Im trying to create a situation where there is no single 'master' in the cluster of brokers. Single point of failure.
I need to use master/slave method because of the HA that I need. But if the 'master' goes down, I can NOT just stop the slave and copy over /data. Ive got live udp packets of stuff coming in that I cant buffer in my application till the master comes back online. From the looks of it the single /data file only 1 borker can have access to it, and thats just to risky for me. So my idea is to have 3 brokers, each being a Slave to the next, but also being a master. Dual Ring round robin kind of thing. One goes down, but because its a slave, the master should send all the stats/connection data to the one that was down. And its slaves reconnect to it. The clients would have failover: for all 3 brokers. Is this even possible? What about race conditions? Has anyone done this? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-Round-Robin-of-Brokers-tp2718127p2718127.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
