Hi,

the more the merrier.

client, configuration and explanation on how to reproduce it would be the best

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net



On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Torbjorn Kristoffersen
<torbjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> By test case do you think it's best to include:
>
> 1) Both activemq config files
> 2) Client STOMP program (a little python client)
>
> Or should it just be the whole log and detailed explanations.
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>> Hi Torbjorn,
>>
>> can you raise a Jira issue for this, ideally with the test case?
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Torbjorn Kristoffersen
>> <torbjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have two ActiveMQ brokers in a simple store and forward setup.
>>>
>>> * Broker B1 is behind a firewall, so it's set up with a duplex
>>> connection to the other broker, B2 (with a public IP).
>>>
>>> * Consumer CCC is connected to B2 and has a durable subscription to 
>>> TestTopic.
>>>
>>> Here is the flow of events:
>>>
>>> 1) Someone on B1's network sends a message for TestTopic
>>> 2) The consumer CCC on B2, gets the message since the store and
>>> forwarding does its job.
>>>
>>> Until this point, everything works fine.  The problems begin when the
>>> connection between B1 and B2 goes down:
>>>
>>> 3) The connection between B1 and B2 goes down
>>> 4) Someone on B1's network sends another message to TestTopic
>>> 5) B1 hangs around, waiting for the connection to come back up. (zzzZzz)
>>> 6) After a few minutes, the internet is working again. Duplex
>>> connection is back up!
>>> 7) The message goes to B2, but the consumer CCC gets absolutely nothing.
>>>    Only when CCC re-connects to B2, he gets the message. Why does
>>> this happen? This consumer can't predict when it should reconnect
>>> because
>>>    it had no idea that the link to B1 went down)
>>>
>>> It is also worth mentioning that I am using ActiveMQ 5.4.1 (also tried
>>> with 5.3.2).  The consumer CCC is connected via STOMP.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to