Hi Roger, yes, you should only add appropriate header to your Stomp message.
Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can the scheduled message feature be used with STOMP? > > Thanks, > > Roger > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Apache ActiveMQ project [1] officially released the 5.4.1 maintenance >> release [2] a couple of months after the previous 5.4.0 release. We are >> extremely grateful to the community for all the contributions. The artifacts >> are already available in the central maven repo. >> >> The 5.4.1 release (see release notes for details [3]) includes approx 49 >> issues resolved, mostly bug fixes: >> failover: protocol doesn't work within a static:() URI in a >> networkConnector >> Failover and prefetch=0 can no longer result in hung consumers >> EOFException if stomp+nio after ActiveMQ has sent the first bytes message >> Configuration error using '&' in transportConnector configuration >> intermittent failure - missing message when cache exhausted with jdbc >> Startup script does not respect JAVA_HOME environment variable >> Associated advisory topics aren't cleaned up when a topic/queue is deleted >> via AdminView >> documentations improvements >> Encrypted passwords >> Added selector support in Ajax >> ... and more >> >> Download [4] ActiveMQ now while it's hot! >> Hadrian >> >> [1] http://activemq.apache.org/ >> [2] >> http://activemq.apache.org/2010/09/22/apache-activemq-541-released.html >> [3] http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-541-release.html >> [4] http://activemq.apache.org/download.html >
