Hi,

do you actually see any messages being sent to DLQ or is it just created?

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net



On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Konstantin Fomin <k.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Dejan,
>
> Thanks a lot for the reply.
> Could you, please, verify if the this configuration is OK for disabling DLQ?
> Unfortunately, when I use it, ActiveMQ.DLQ gets created:
>
>
>
>  $ cat activemq.xml
>
> <beans
>  xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
>  xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
>  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>  xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd
>  http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd";>
>
>
>    <bean 
> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
>        <property name="locations">
>            <value>file:${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties</value>
>        </property>
>    </bean>
>
>    <broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
> brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"
> destroyApplicationContextOnStop="true">
>
>        <destinations>
>            <queue physicalName="TESTING.EMAIL"/>
>        </destinations>
>
>        <destinationPolicy>
>            <policyMap>
>              <policyEntries>
>
>
>               <policyEntry queue=">">
>                <deadLetterStrategy>
>                  <sharedDeadLetterStrategy processExpired="false" />
>                </deadLetterStrategy>
>               </policyEntry>
>
>
>                <policyEntry topic=">" producerFlowControl="true"
> memoryLimit="5mb">
>                  <pendingSubscriberPolicy>
>                    <vmCursor />
>                  </pendingSubscriberPolicy>
>                </policyEntry>
>
>                <policyEntry queue=">" producerFlowControl="true"
> memoryLimit="1mb">
>                </policyEntry>
>
>              </policyEntries>
>            </policyMap>
>        </destinationPolicy>
>
>
>        <managementContext>
>            <managementContext createConnector="false"/>
>        </managementContext>
>
>        <persistenceAdapter>
>            <amqPersistenceAdapter syncOnWrite="false"
> directory="${activemq.base}/data" maxFileLength="20 mb"/>
>        </persistenceAdapter>
>
>        <systemUsage>
>            <systemUsage>
>                <memoryUsage>
>                    <memoryUsage limit="20 mb"/>
>                </memoryUsage>
>                <storeUsage>
>                    <storeUsage limit="500 mb"/>
>                </storeUsage>
>                <tempUsage>
>                    <tempUsage limit="100 mb"/>
>                </tempUsage>
>            </systemUsage>
>        </systemUsage>
>
>        <transportConnectors>
>            <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://localhost:60000"/>
>        </transportConnectors>
>
>    </broker>
>
>    <import resource="jetty.xml"/>
>
> </beans>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>         <deadLetterStrategy>
>>           <sharedDeadLetterStrategy processExpired="false" />
>>         </deadLetterStrategy>
>>
>> should do the trick. Can you test it and create a test case if it doesn't?
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Konstantin Fomin <k.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello, all,
>>>
>>> Can anyone share sample activemq.xml configuration with DLQ turned off?
>>>
>>> I've tried 
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html
>>>  guides with no luck.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sincerely yours,
>>> Konstantin.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Konstantin.
>

Reply via email to