Hi Charles, This creates 2 separate virtual subscriptions to the topic, which will create a separate queue for each consumer. What you want is for both to connect to the same destination name 'Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.Orders', just as you would do for a normal load-balanced queue.
cheers, James. -- On 1 June 2010 13:16, cmoulliard <cmoulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have configured an ActiveMq server 5.3.2 to use VirtualTopic : > > <!-- Virtual topics --> > <destinationInterceptors> > <virtualDestinationInterceptor> > <virtualDestinations> > <virtualTopic name=">" /> > </virtualDestinations> > </virtualDestinationInterceptor> > </destinationInterceptors> > > I have two consumers connected to the following queues : > > Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.Orders > Consumer.B.VirtualTopic.Orders > > and I produce the messages like that > > ant producer -Dsubject="VirtualTopic.Orders" -Dtopic="true" -Ddurable=true > -Dmax=200 > > When I look to the messages received by ConsumerA and ConsumerB, they > receive both all the messages. > > Question : Is it a normal behavior or should I do something else to > loadbalance messages between consumers where messages are published in a > VirtualTopic ? > > KR, > > > > > ----- > Charles Moulliard > SOA Architect > > My Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Strange-behavior-with-VirtualTopic-and-loadbalancing-tp28740437p28740437.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
