I am looking into clustering ActiveMQ brokers, the Master and Slave approach seems the best approach.
One Master one or more slaves depending on the cluster. I have discounted the pure master slave since to restart the master you have to take the slave down. So I am looking at the JDBC Master Slave Cluster. If I understand it correctly. messages are sent to the master persisted to the database. If A Master goes down a slave that aquires the database lock takes over. What happens to messages still in the queues that have not yet been persisted being recieved or sent. Are they lost, can a slave be configured to take over the Masters queues, does this happen automatically. Are there any links that cover clustering in depth. Thanks for any help Tony -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-Cluster-question-tp28288022p28288022.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
