On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:55 AM, cmoulliard <cmoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I presume that when we create a network of 2 brokers running in the same
> jvm, it makes more sense to use the vm:// as the protocol to interconnect
> the master broker with the slave ?
>
> <networkConnectors>
> <networkConnector uri="static://(vm://localhost:61617)"/>
> </networkConnectors>
>
> So, we can boost performance for transferring messages from one broker to
> another and reduce cpu/memory consumption ?
Yes, use of the VM transport will certainly eliminate the use of the
TCP stack, but I question the value of a broker network that exists in
a single JVM.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
