Using the examples was I good tip, didn't know that one. When I used these, no messages got lost. Producer and Consumer always had the same count of messages.
Gary Tully wrote: > > one though, to alleviate any potential problem in the application code, it > may be worth trying the example > <http://activemq.apache.org/examples.html>producer and consumer from > both boxes. > > On 19 February 2010 16:53, js.w <js.wal...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> In the last few days I've tried several configurations on several servers >> and saw some rather unusual results which I can't really figure out. >> I have a simple scenario for the JMS Server. A process adds about 10k >> messages (about 1kb size each) to a queue. A second process reads all the >> messages and acknowledges them by auto-ack (I also tried explicit >> confirms). >> I tried this scenario on 2 different machines with different results. On >> Linux, all messages are passed on exactly as expected. On Windows on the >> other hand quite a lot of the messages (about 10%) get lost. The sender >> successfully sends 10k messages and has 10k message-ids. The >> web-interface >> on the other hand only shows something about 9k messages in the queue and >> the next worker only gets the 9k messages delivered. >> Both environments have the same version of Java, ActiveMQ and config. >> >> So far I can only exclude the client as cause, because on Linux and >> Windows, >> both behave the same way. So the problem should exist somewhere in the >> server part. >> >> machine 1: >> 64bit debian testing >> ActiveMQ 5.3 >> changed the config to disable flowcontrol (otherwise config left >> untouched) >> Java 6 >> >> machine 2: >> 32 Windows 2003 (sp2) >> ActiveMQ 5.3 >> changed the config to disable flowcontrol (otherwise config left >> untouched) >> Java 6 >> >> PS: I already tried the following connection parameters without any luck >> optimizedMessageDispatch >> useCompression >> On the server side I tried different stores (kahaDB, Oracle,Postgres) >> -> all with the same result >> I also tried running the Server with Java5 which also had no effect on >> the behavior. >> >> Does anybody have a clue or idea where the problem lies or how to explain >> the discrepancy? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> Regards, jens >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-looses-messages-under-windows-2003-tp27656958p27656958.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-looses-messages-under-windows-2003-tp27656958p27691164.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
