Oops, found the answer with just a little more checking. I compared my activemq.xml to the new example ones and noticed a change to the <transportConnectors> from 'uri="tcp://localhost:61616"' to 'uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61616"'. Made the change in my config and, I'm back up and running.
Ron RKParkJr wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been working on a system using 5.2.0 which is basically laid out as > follows: > > Machine1(M1): Runs a broker (B1)and some code that pushes messages onto a > topic > Machine2(M2): Runs a broker (B2) that has a bridge from the topic on B1 > and some code > that reads from the topic and writes some stuff onto a couple of > different queues. > Machine3(M3): Runs some code that reads from the queues in broker B2. > > All this was working but I was running into issues where the bridge kept > dropping and reconnecting. > > In reading the forums here, it looked like there was a fix for this in > 5.3.0, so I upgraded both brokers to that version. > > Now I'm having trouble on M3 connecting my code there to broker B2; > however, the code on M2 connects to B2 with no problem as does the code on > M1 to B1. Similarly, if I try to skip the bridge and connect the code on > M2 to B1, I get: > > javax.jms.JMSException: Could not connect to broker URL: tcp://M1:61616. > Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > > I turned up logging to debug on the brokers to see if that revealed > anything but when I connect from a remote machine, nothing gets logged at > all. This lead me to test the underlying network: > > On M1, I did this: > > telnet localhost 61616 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1). > Escape character is '^]'. > �ActiveMQ� CacheSize > CacheEnabledSizePrefixDisabled > MaxInactivityDurationInitalDelay'TcpNoDelayEnabledMaxInactivityDurationu0TightEncodingEnabledStackTraceEnabled^]^] > Connection closed by foreign host. > > On M2, when I try this: > > telnet M1 61616 > Trying 10.10.112.89... > telnet: connect to address 10.10.112.89: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused > > > To highlight: no changes in my code, no changes (that I know of) in the > network or DNS (e.g. ping works), no changes in the activemq.xml on either > machine. The only changes seem to be the 5.3.0 and the jars that came > with it. > > Thanks in advance, > Ron > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Remote-connection-issues-with-5.3.0-tp27643737p27644458.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
