Hi Marteen, both adapters can do that work. KahaDB is improvement over AMQ persistence adapter. It provides better scalability (as it uses less threads) and better recovery time (as it uses indexes). However it is a bit slower, but still performant enough. I'd suggest you use one of the configuration files distributed with 5.3.0 release as a starting point of your configuration.
Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Maarten_D <maarten.dir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm a little confused as to which persistence adapter I should use, perhaps > someone can give me some guidance. > > My applications requires AMQ to handle a steady stream of several hundred > messages per hour, with occasional bursts of several tens of thousands per > hour (on a topic). > > Which would be the best persistence adapter for this scenario? > > Thanks in advance, > Maarten Dirkse > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/amqPersistenceAdapter-or-kahaDB--tp27113427p27113427.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
