Hi, I'm trying to use the new Activemq protobuf package and find the documentation a bit sparse, therefore this message.
In the API I can choose between framed and unframed versions of the different marshalling /unmarshalling methods and I have found out that they are not interoperable, i.e. that I cannot do : byte[] byteBuffer = object.toframedByteArray(); MyClass obj2 = MyClass.parseUnframed(byteBuffer); What is the difference between the two formats? Which is directly related to the standard Protobuf format? I.e. which of the two can I be sure will be parsed correctly by a different protobuf client? Kind regards, Tarjei -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Protobuf-usage-question%3A-Difference-between-framed-and-unframed-buffers-tp26955008p26955008.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
