Do you have some broken test case? It would be great to have some concrete examples of what does not work atm.
2009/12/9 jp.belanger <jp.belan...@gmail.com> > > > rajdavies wrote: > > > > > > On 5 Nov 2009, at 05:58, Roland T. Lichti wrote: > > > >> I'm willing to do try it - but only if there is a chance to get it > >> back > >> into SVN (I don't need to be the committer, somebody may check my code > >> and even refuse it if it is not up to the standards). But if the > >> idea of > >> a full XA compatible RA is not wanted by the core team, it is not > >> worth > >> the time to code it ... > >> > >> bye, > >> Roland > > > > Hi Roland, > > > > would love to get the contribution! > > > > cheers, > > > > Rob > > > > > > Anything new on this topic? > > I'm having transaction recovery problem in my production environment and > it's getting bad. > > I've tried making the RA adapter XA compatible but most of the Managed and > proxy object don't fit very well with the XA versions of Connection, > XASession and such. And lack the knowledge of the inner working of ActiveMQ > to do this in a reasonable time. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/XAResourceRecovery-for-ActiveMQ-on-JBoss-tp24933498p26712047.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com
