Here are the 2 modified files (the servlet and the transport (which is doing nothing :) ) As i' m not an expert into web dev nor in AMQ (just playing with it since a few days) , i think this can be improved a lot.
Regards Dejan Bosanac wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > there's already opened enhancement request in Jira for that, > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2469. Any submitted > patches are appreciated. > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Thierry H <thierry.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello >> I 'm trying to embed AMQ(5.3) into tomcat(6) with a simple WAR which is >> containing the configuration files and all the JARs. I also want to use >> Http >> Tunnel to avoid firewall issue ( so i' ll be using the tomcat port) >> >> To do that i've tried to use the servlet >> (HttpSpringEmbeddedTunnelServlet) >> which isdelivered into the optional package and which seem to be done for >> that. >> >> May be it's due to the fact that i'm just start to use AMQ but i was >> unable >> to make them work without modification for following reasons: >> >> 1 >> - The servlet is using the BrokerFactoryBean -> XBeanBrokerService >> which is starting automatically the broker. >> - Then adding the TransportConnector on a started broker is doing >> nothing , and the HttpTunnelServlet cannot be initialised since the >> accept >> listener is not set. >> >> => to avoid that i had to add start="false" into the broker tag of >> the >> activemq.xml >> This may be something usefull to have this into a documentation >> to embed a broker : >> configure using a xml and the BrokerFactoryBean, then add >> what >> you want to have programmatic-ally and then start the broker , but if you >> do >> that ....... >> >> >> 2 >> The second part is about the HttpTransportServer which is starting a >> jetty server >> But the Bind address which is used is the one already used by tomcat >> It was unable to start. >> >> => to avoid the problem i 've made a another HttpTransportServer >> class which is doing nothing except what is done into the base class >> TransportServerSupport. >> I also add to modify the HttpEmbeddedTunnelServlet , since the >> context which is used to transmit information with its base class >> (HttpTunnelServlet) is set to the wrong attribute ( >> "transportChannelListener" when the base class expect the value to be set >> on >> the attribute "acceptListener" ) >> >> After doing thing all seems to work for now. >> >> I may be totally wrong in my analysis and what i ve done . But if >> somebody >> can confirm that , i ll be happy to give the modified classes and open >> the >> associated ticket in Jira. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Another-need-for-integrating-embedded-broker-into-Tomcat-tp26651812p26651812.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > ----- > Dejan Bosanac > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > http://old.nabble.com/file/p26676219/HttpExternalEmbeddedTunnelServlet.java HttpExternalEmbeddedTunnelServlet.java http://old.nabble.com/file/p26676219/HttpExternalTransportServer.java HttpExternalTransportServer.java -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Another-need-for-integrating-embedded-broker-into-Tomcat-tp26651812p26676219.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
