Think this is resolved by https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2468 which is fixed on trunk and the 5.3 branch. The pagedInPendingDispatch list which was accumulating messages is now limited. This was highlighted by the jmx purge operation but the same logic holds for the browse that is used by there expiry task. Can you validate with a current 5.4-SNAPSHOT?
2009/11/9 afei <afei1...@126.com>: > > > when a large of messages in queue,and no consumer or the consumer is very > slow, the OOM problem occur, because : > in org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue,the 588 line is : > doBrowse(true, browsedMessages, this.getMaxExpirePageSize()); > ,transform to : > doBrowse(false, browsedMessages, this.getMaxExpirePageSize()); > is ok. > > > Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> >> Hi Mitch, >> >> yeah, I said in thread I was referring to, that it is working with >> "regular" >> stomp connector. I started investigating AMQ-2440 patch the other day, >> should be have something soon. >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Mitch Granger >> <mitch.gran...@sophos.com>wrote: >> >>> So we turned off stomp+nio and went back to plain old stomp and so far >>> it's >>> working fine. New(IO) isn't always better, I guess :-) >>> >>> Seems like maybe it's this issue -> >>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2440 >>> >>> >>> afei wrote: >>> >>>> i have same problem >>>> >>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p26093204/aaaaaa.jpg aaaaaa.jpg >>>> >>>> >>>> themitchy wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is what we've done to tune so far: >>>>> >>>>> - UseDedicatedTaskRunner=false >>>>> - flow control is off >>>>> - stomp transport uses transport.closeAsync=false >>>>> >>>>> I agree that it is because of the high number of open/close connections >>>>> from Stomp. When we monitor through JConsole we can see more threads >>>>> starting up for each new connection. The problem is that these threads >>>>> don't get let go. Even though the stomp clients are disconnecting the >>>>> number of threads that get released is less than the number created. >>>>> So >>>>> the thread count goes up and up until it fails. All of the above >>>>> settings/tuning only delay when it will hit the wall. >>>>> >>>>> Dejan Bosanac wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mitch, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the root cause of this problem is that you probably have Stomp >>>>>> clients that open/close connection at a high rate. I simulated this >>>>>> problem >>>>>> on OSX with a StompLoadTest ( >>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/transport/stomp/StompLoadTest.java?view=log >>>>>> ), >>>>>> while trying to reproduce "too many open files" problem. You can find >>>>>> some >>>>>> of my findings (and workaround) in this thread. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/%22too-many-open-files%22-error-with-5.3-and-Stomp-tt25888831.html#a26010080 >>>>>> >>>>>> (BTW. it is producing "too many open files" problem on linux) >>>>>> Basically, >>>>>> the >>>>>> problem with stomp is that every send is done in separate connection >>>>>> and >>>>>> thus considered to be a new producer for every message. So when >>>>>> producer >>>>>> flow control is hit, the producers are piling up and probably not >>>>>> releasing >>>>>> connections. Thus you can observe large number of tcp connections on >>>>>> the >>>>>> system in state TIME_WAIT (and TIME_CLOSE), which causes that the >>>>>> system >>>>>> limit is hit at one point. In the above thread, you can find a >>>>>> workaround >>>>>> that worked for me for that test. I started investigating this more >>>>>> and >>>>>> hopefully I'll have some more findings in the near future. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb >>>>>> >>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Mitch Granger >>>>>> <mitch.gran...@sophos.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Update: We've [nearly] proven that this only happens with AMQ running >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> openVZ. What exactly is causing it, we're still not sure. After >>>>>>> memoryUsage is met, the number of threads skyrockets until we get >>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It works just fine on regular hardware; We're going to try VMWare >>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One thing really worth mentioning is that by using the fileCursor we >>>>>>> actually started seeing it use the Temp Store. When reading about >>>>>>> systemUsage it is NOT intuitive that the Temp Store does not come >>>>>>> into >>>>>>> play >>>>>>> with the default cursor. Anyone keeping a significant volume of >>>>>>> messages on >>>>>>> their queues should be well served by changing the cursor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mitch Granger wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Config is attached. We have also tried the activemq-scalability.xml >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> the only change being adding a stomp connector. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once we hit the memoryUsage limit we can [sometimes] connect new >>>>>>>> consumers >>>>>>>> but nothing comes back after we send the SUBSCRIBE frame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I expect sending to fail when we hit this limit but if we can't >>>>>>>> subscribe >>>>>>>> there's no chance of recovering from this state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rob Davies wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 26 Oct 2009, at 17:38, themitchy wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're using only persistent messages and heap size is set to 2GB >>>>>>>>> yet >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>>> the memoryUsage limit quite quickly (system usage config below). >>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> followed by "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new >>>>>>>>>> native >>>>>>>>>> thread" >>>>>>>>>> as the process quickly reaches the 2GB of heap we gave it. How >>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> getting to that point with the memoryUsage limit set far below it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there no way to get AMQ to gracefully limit it's memory usage? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <systemUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <systemUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <memoryUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <memoryUsage limit="256 mb"/> >>>>>>>>>> </memoryUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <storeUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <storeUsage limit="60 gb" name="foo"/> >>>>>>>>>> </storeUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <tempUsage> >>>>>>>>>> <tempUsage limit="60 gb"/> >>>>>>>>>> </tempUsage> >>>>>>>>>> </systemUsage> >>>>>>>>>> </systemUsage> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Out-of-Memory-on-5.3-tp26064098p26064098.html >>>>>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you send the rest of your config ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rob Davies >>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/rajdavies >>>>>>>>> I work here: http://fusesource.com >>>>>>>>> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> ----- >> Dejan Bosanac >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p26264779/dump.jpg > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Out-of-Memory-on-5.3-tp26064098p26264779.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com
