Actually using an exclusive consumer is a great idea - also Message
Groups - would work in a similar way too.
cheers,
Rob
On 6 Aug 2009, at 23:37, jerdavis wrote:
Thanks for your answer Rob, this is exactly what I was looking for. :)
Total Ordering seems like such a fundamental thing for a Persistent
Queue.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a solid answer to this question. Is
there a
standard way people get around this?
Would an Exclusive Consumer guarantee Total Order?
I would think that a new Exclusive consumer wouldn't be able to
consume
messages until the crashed TCP connection/consumer finally closed and
released the outstanding messages.
Regards,
-JD
rajdavies wrote:
On 5 Aug 2009, at 23:13, jerdavis wrote:
No takers?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Total-Message-Order-of-Queues-%28not-topics%29-durring-edge-cases%28crashes%29-tp24705154p24837185.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Total ordering may be violated for consumer crashes with the default
prefetch sizes - see
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html
to reduce this possibility to a single message - set a prefetch size
= 0.
cheers,
Rob
Rob Davies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Total-Message-Order-of-Queues-%28not-topics%29-durring-edge-cases%28crashes%29-tp24705154p24855824.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
