What about using a prefetch limit of 1 in combination with client acknowledge?
Joe http://www.ttmsolutions.com mkonda wrote: > > I got a specific issue - I need to introduce a delay in sending a message > to a second consumer. Let me explain: > > There are two consumer on one Destination. A user is connected to only one > of these consumers at any time. So, if one consumer is doing process (say, > BUSY), the users are routed to the second consumer. > > The flow is like this: > > First consumer will receive the message. It then changes its state to BUSY > so users are routed to second consumer. It does the some process upon > receiving the message (while the second consumer shouldn't receive at all > but serves the users though). > > Once the first consumer finishes the process, the second consumer should > receive the same message. So, the second consumer becomes BUSY while first > consumer now servers the users. It does same process as first consumer. > > BOTH consumers are EXACTLY SAME - they do the EXACT process. The only > difference is that - only one of the consumers will be exposed to the > external client. > > So, my question is - is there a way to ask the Second consumer to pick up > the message only when first consumer finishes? > > (Remember that the processing will swap from first to second consumer and > from second consumer to first) > > Any thoughts (I'll sincerely appreiate) > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Introducing-delay-on-a-Consumer-tp24425259p24426893.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
