On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:30 AM, riteshtijoriwala
<riteshtijoriw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I have two consumers C1 and C2 and two brokers B1 and B2 that see each other.
> I have one producer P1.
>
> P1 is connected initially to B1 and C2 is connected to B1. C1 is connected
> to B2. The initial start is as follows:
>
> P1 produces 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, (B1 failed), 7, 8, 9, 10.
> C1 gets 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 8
> C2 gets 2, 4, 6, (B1 failed), 10
>
> As seen above, I fail B1. P1 and C2 failover to B2. But now the strange
> things happen. C1 starts to get messages out of order. Is there a way to
> prevent this? How can I ensure that in case of broker failure, after
> failover has occurred, consumers will receive messages in order.
>
> To be specific, how can I assure that msg # 8 is processed before message #
> 9 & 10?
There is currently no way on the broker side to preserve message order
with multiple brokers.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
