Hi there,
I apologize for not heaving read all the information from the
beginning - I shouldn't answer mails while traveling ;)
I could reproduce the problem using your test case in both AMQ 5.2 and
the current trunk.
I have made the same observations regarding the objects that are
growing in number. As a side issue, the reported
number via jconsole regarding the Queuesize is misleading. There are
actually no messages available for delivery
even if the queue size shows a number > 0. I believe there is an open
issue regarding that misleading metric:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1600
I think that explains why you see a queue size > 0.
This having said, a very brief look at the code, the interceptor
dealing with Mirrored queues simply recreates
the send ProducerExchange and calls the delivery for that. Why the
memory leak occurs here, but not with
a "normal" publisher to a topic with no subscribers, is not yet clear
to me. Perhaps someone else can jump in here.
I think for now it would be best to create a JIRA and attach your test
case if possible, so that we can track that properly.
Best regards
Andreas
On Mar 25, 2009, at 3:00 PM, jvh wrote:
We're using activemq-all-5.2.0.jar ... more information is listed at
the
bottom of the original post.
Andreas Gies-3 wrote:
Hi there,
which version of Active MQ are you using ?
Regards
Andreas
On Mar 24, 2009, at 9:20 PM, jvh wrote:
We are experiencing an OutOfMemoryError when using MirroredQueues
and I was
wondering if someone could comment on whether our use (or
interpretation) of
these Mirrored Queues is correct, or if there is a bug in the
BrokerService
code.
In our case, we have an existing application “A” that uses
messaging, but we
now have a new application “B” that will only sometimes monitor the
messaging on the original application “A”. We don’t want the first
application “A” to have to know about, or to do anything different
if
application “B” is there listening to the messages or not.
This seemed like a decent use of MirroredQueues (since they
evidently create
a “topic” that can be used as a wire-tap), but evidently by setting
BrokerService.setUseMirroredQueues(true) on the broker for Project
“A”,
we’ve introduced a rather large memory leak.
The objects that appear to grow in number are:
org.apache.activemq.store.memory.MemoryTransactionStore$2
org.apache.activemq.store.memory.MemoryTopicMessageStore
org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQTopic
This seems to suggest the mirrored messages are being retained, but
the
Broker has setPersistent(false) specified and I don’t see any way to
set
Time to Live, or any other way for the Broker to monitor and
remove if
necessary on the Mirrored Queue only, etc.. If I look at the queues
via
jConsole MBeans, I can see the
Topic.VirtualTopic.Mirror.DacIncomingQueue
with attributes showing that the messages are only being enqueue and
not
dequeued. I really want the Broker to drop these messages if
Application
“B” is not there to dequeue them.
Is it recommended that we use MirroredQueues to do this? If so,
what’s the
best way to set things up so I don’t have a memory problem if the
other
application is not listening to the mirroredQueue? … and if not, we
would
appreciate any other suggestions.
---- For attached Example Code----
The code attached is a simplified version of our Project “A” only
and
represents the case where Project “B” is not online (and not
included in
this example at all in fact) … it does show our use of Spring
Templates to
set up the Broker (and the producer and consumer clients). I’ve
tried to
remove quite a bit of the extraneous stuff to try to get it down to
the
basic problem, but I apologize that it still has a bit of fluff.
I’ve also
arranged things such that the broker is in a separate JVM to more
easily see
the memory growth of this component. The BrokerService is specified
in the
jms.broker.BrokerBean class.
For the attached code and the 8MB specified for the JVM, we get
about 3542
messages before the broker dies with an OutOfMemoryError
I’ve also noticed that there is a
BrokerService.setUseTempMirroredQueue()
method and wonder if that is more appropriate for my use since it
implies
that the Mirrored Queue will be temporary, but the JavaDoc for this
message
is empty and I’ve seen nothing on the forums as to its
characteristics and
proper use. When I do use the Temporary Mirrored Queues, I also
don’t see
the same Virtual Topic that should be created that I see with the
regular
MirroredQueue topic (i.e. I don’t see VirtualTopic.Mirror.Foo.Bar
being
created for a queue of Foo.Bar), so this doesn’t seem to fit our
needs.
If you want to run the code, run jms-broker first, then run jms-
client
(client contains both a message producer and consumer). There is a
README.txt file in the top level directory of each application for
build and
execution instructions.
Using ActiveMQ 5.2.0 and Spring 2.5.4 on a Windows XP SP2 platform
(but
we’ve seen this on unix platforms as well) and I’ve been using
jconsole, and
jvisualvm to monitor memory growth and queues
http://www.nabble.com/file/p22688889/jmsMirroredQueueExample.zip
jmsMirroredQueueExample.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-MirroredQueues-results-in-OutOfMemoryError-tp22688889p22688889.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Mit freundlichen Grüssen - Kind Regards
Andreas Gies
Principal Consultant
Open Source Center of Competence
Progress Software GmbH
Agrippinawerft 26
50678 Köln
E-Mail ag...@progress.com
Direct Line +49 (0)9953 980349
Mobile +49 (0)170 5759611
Skype +44 (0)20 3239 2922
Skype +353 (0)1 443 4971
Skype +1 (0)781 262 0168
http://www.progress.com
http://fusesource.com
http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com
-------------------------------------------------------
Progress Software GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Agrippinawerft 26, 50678 Koeln;
Niederlassung: Fuerstenrieder Str. 279, 81377 Muenchen
Amtsgericht Koeln, HRB 15620;
Geschaeftsfuehrung: David Ireland
-------------------------------------------------------
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-MirroredQueues-results-in-OutOfMemoryError-tp22688889p22702274.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Mit freundlichen Grüssen - Kind Regards
Andreas Gies
Principal Consultant
Open Source Center of Competence
Progress Software GmbH
Agrippinawerft 26
50678 Köln
E-Mail ag...@progress.com
Direct Line +49 (0)9953 980349
Mobile +49 (0)170 5759611
Skype +44 (0)20 3239 2922
Skype +353 (0)1 443 4971
Skype +1 (0)781 262 0168
http://www.progress.com
http://fusesource.com
http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com
-------------------------------------------------------
Progress Software GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Agrippinawerft 26, 50678 Koeln;
Niederlassung: Fuerstenrieder Str. 279, 81377 Muenchen
Amtsgericht Koeln, HRB 15620;
Geschaeftsfuehrung: David Ireland
-------------------------------------------------------
