2009/3/17 janylj <jan...@gmail.com>: > > I was trying to have a centralized repository of destinations and > ConnectionFactory. I could use a uniform namespace for destination to avoid > conflicting. However, I don't want to allow users creating destination or > ConnectionFactory on the fly. I would like them accessing the broker only > through administrative objects. > > Because my clients are not running inside J2EE container, I am using LDAP > for JNDI. I wish ActiveMQ has a built JNDI server in the broker side. > Therefore, I don't have to deploy another LDAP server and worry about its HA > solution and other topics that we have already invested in the broker side.
A message broker is kinda different from a HA LDAP server - however you can just deploy Apache Directory Server in the same JVM as the broker if you like... http://directory.apache.org/ -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
