Much appreciated, Do you know if there is any other way to achieve such a functionality without the use of Failover? -Other than having a second activemq service running, and connecting to it if an error occurs.
Timothy Bish wrote: > > pyActiveMQ uses ActiveMQ-CPP which currently does not support Failover. > There is work ongoing to add Failover to ActiveMQ-CPP v3.0 once that's > done the author of pyActiveMQ could then release a new version that > would give you Failover functionality. > > Regards > Tim. > > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 06:55 -0800, Jahvid.Williams wrote: >> Good Day All, >> >> I have written a consumer using pyactivemq, however in-terms of using a >> failover connection does anyone know if this is possible? >> >> On the AMQ site: " >> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html >> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html " it says >> that >> i should use: >> >> failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://remotehost:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=100 >> However im uncertain as to how i go about using this. So far in the >> examples >> of pyactivemq code that i found they mention nothing of this. So i guess >> im >> just trying to find out if it in-fact at all possible. > > -- > Tim Bish > http://fusesource.com > http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failover-Transport---pyactivemq-tp21415972p21416770.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
