you could try the current 5.2 release candidate (rc3):
You can get the binary distributions here:
http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2.0
2008/11/12 sub3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I guess upgrading was a bad idea. Now I get spammed on the console with the
> message below. Can someone suggest a version between the 2 that will work?
> Thanks.
>
> 2008-11-12 15:37:04,156 [ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:1293] ERROR
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Service - Async error
> occurred: javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledege: MessageAck
> {commandId = 24086, responseRequired = false, ackType = 2, consumerId =
> ID:ll-1291-1226503873718-0:1:2:3769, firstMessageId =
> ID:ll-1334-1226503884890-0:2:1:1:17101, lastMessageId =
> ID:ll-1334-1226503884890-0:2:1:1:17285, destination = queue://DRACM,
> transactionId = null, messageCount = 66}; Expected message count (66)
> differs from count in dispatched-list (93)
> javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledege: MessageAck {commandId =
> 24086, responseRequired = false, ackType = 2, consumerId =
> ID:ll-1291-1226503873718-0:1:2:3769, firstMessageId =
> ID:ll-1334-1226503884890-0:2:1:1:17101, lastMessageId =
> ID:ll-1334-1226503884890-0:2:1:1:17285, destination = queue://DRACM,
> transactionId = null, messageCount = 66}; Expected message count (66)
> differs from count in dispatched-list (93)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.PrefetchSubscription.assertAckMatchesDispatched(PrefetchSubscription.java:446)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.PrefetchSubscription.acknowledge(PrefetchSubscription.java:188)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.AbstractRegion.acknowledge(AbstractRegion.java:373)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.RegionBroker.acknowledge(RegionBroker.java:462)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransactionBroker.acknowledge(TransactionBroker.java:194)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFilter.acknowledge(BrokerFilter.java:74)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFilter.acknowledge(BrokerFilter.java:74)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.MutableBrokerFilter.acknowledge(MutableBrokerFilter.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processMessageAck(TransportConnection.java:456)
> at org.apache.activemq.command.MessageAck.visit(MessageAck.java:205)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConnection.java:305)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:179)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFilter.java:68)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(WireFormatNegotiator.java:143)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand(InactivityMonitor.java:206)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSupport.java:84)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:203)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:185)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Stack-Overflow-tp20443204p20462894.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
