Yeah, the web console is terrible. I don't trust it all anymore. Which kind of sucks because reported numbers like pending count, number of consumers, etc are nice to know.
Sigh, I'll try testing it again with a test queue and see if the load balancing is happening correctly. Thanks for the help, -- Joel ammulder wrote: > > I don't see anything obviously wrong with the config files. I > normally give each networkConnector a unique name attribute, but I > don't think that would cause it to not work. I don't typically use > the Web console, though (I think issues like the negative message > count are known) -- to test it "the old-fashioned way" I'd just send > messages to one of the brokers and attach listeners to both brokers > and make sure each listener sees some messages. You may have to send > a large number of messages to see significant "load balancing" across > the network, though. (I know there are some settings that affect > this, but as I recall the default is not to always send messages to > local clients so I would expect to see some load balancing happening.) > > Thanks, > Aaron > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Store-and-forward-not-working--tp19937282p19965293.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
