On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, jmychasiw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
> We are currently evaluating ActiveMq 5.x
>
> We are trying to decide between AMQMessageStore and jdbc persistence to
> Oracle. The documentation seems to advocate for AMQMessageStore over jdbc.
> Our project requires that massages cannot be lost.
>
> What are reasons that I would pick one over the other?
The reason for this is that persistence to JDBC can be very slow,
especially when compared to the AMQ Message Store.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
