I would like to get people's feedback on strong naming of the NMS
assemblies.  I am working on releasing NMS 1.0, and this is now a
priority issue.  I would like to hear some arguments for having strong
named assemblies, other than "Microsoft recommends it."

I think strong naming these assemblies causes more problems than any
potential benefits.  I would like to turn off the strong naming, and
go with the standard weak naming.

Thoughts/arguments for/against?

Reply via email to