The documentation is misleading. It shouldn't list multicast as one of the transport protocols and definitely not on the main page.
http://activemq.apache.org/ - Supports pluggable transport protocols such as in-VM, TCP, SSL, NIO, UDP, multicast, JGroups and JXTA transports. http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html Shimi Joe Fernandez wrote: > > The second posting's thread states that reliable multicast is currently on > the todo list and that JGroups is not an option, because "JGroups is LGPL > and slow". > > Joe > www.ttmsolutions.com > > > > Shimik wrote: >> >> According to these posts there are others who are looking for the same >> thing. I can't figure out if it exist or not. >> http://www.nabble.com/Reliable-Multicast-and-ActiveMQ-td17806853.html >> http://www.nabble.com/It-is-possible-to-configure-Broker-Client-to-use-reliable-UDP-protocol-for-Topics-and-TCP-IP-for-Queues--td17992071.html >> http://www.nabble.com/Multicast-ConnectionTransport--td18283185.html >> >> >> Maybe someone can shade light on this issue. >> >> Shimi >> >> >> David Crisp wrote: >>> >>> Hi Shimik, >>> I'm looking for the same info, although I'm currently on 4.1.2. >>> When I did a code dive, I noticed that there are multicast connectors >>> (transport & network) although they appear to be unreliable. My >>> attempts >>> to use it have been unsuccessful so far. >>> >>> Good luck, >>> D. >>> >>> >>> Shimik wrote: >>>> >>>> Does multicast transport exist in 5.1? Reliable using JGroups/JRMS or >>>> unreliable. >>>> According to this http://activemq.apache.org/uri-protocols.html, one >>>> might think it does. >>>> If it does, how can I use it? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-multicast-transport-exist--tp18488375p18552259.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
