rajdavies wrote: > > > Network of brokers is definitely the way to go - as you can use them > as 'concentrators' on each side of the wan. It also allows more > resilience - as networks use store and forward, if the WAN is > unavailable, the local clients can still carry on communicating with > their local broker. > > > cheers, > > Rob > > http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > >
Thanks for the reply, Rob! One more question - it sounds as if these 'concentrators' will then be single points of failure, as the local clients are relying on them to communicate over the WAN. Is there any way to setup a failover in this scenario, so that in case one of the concentrators goes down, a new broker can act as the concentrator? I'm not sure how the <networkconnector> setup would look like for this. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WAN-performance-tp17524913s2354p17540451.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
