thx much. ragards yolcuabbas
rajdavies wrote: > > failover depends on the InactivityMonitor - but also socket death too > - which might take a while to percolate through. > > cheers, > > Rob > On 19 Feb 2008, at 07:27, yolcuabbas wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> thanks for prompt reply. We can not upgrade easyl, because we use >> amq 4.1.1 >> in production :( is it true, that failover protocol depends on >> InactivityMonitor? >> >> regards, >> fatih >> >> >> rajdavies wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> yolcuabbas wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we use activemq 4.1.1 and have following problem. the uri is >>>> failover://(tcp://xxxx:xxx?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0). >>>> >>>> If I put the value of maxInactivityDuration to 0 and try to stop the >>>> connection over jconsole, my client dont try to reconnect to >>>> broker. is >>>> the failover protocol depends on inactivityMonitor? >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Is it possible to move to 5.0 ? >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/disabling-InactivityMonitor-%28-maxInactivityDuration-%3D-0-%29-disables-failover-tp15541461s2354p15559973.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/disabling-InactivityMonitor-%28-maxInactivityDuration-%3D-0-%29-disables-failover-tp15541461s2354p15562521.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
