It sounds like your embedded client broker connects to the server, but not the other way around? Each of the embedded brokers must have a network connector to the other (forwarding bridge) if you expect both to produce/forward messages to one another. In 4.1, connections between brokers are one-way only or half-duplex.
In 5.0, you can use the 'duplex' option to make a connection full-duplex or bi-directional. Joe Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi ! > > I'm new with ActiveMQ > > I succeeded in implementing a kind of Question/Answers protocol between a > client and a server, using JNDI-defined queues and temporary queues > (setJMSReplyTo, in the question JMS message and one temporary queue by > client thread) for the answer. > > I have two different servers : > - the first has an ActiveMQ standalone instance and the Client Process > which connects to the ActiveMQ standalone instance with a TCP localhost > transport. > - the second has an ActiveMQ standalone instance and the Server process > which connects to the ActiveMQ standalone instance with a TCP localhost > transport > > The two ActiveMQ instances are in a network of brokers. > In this configuration, all is fine. Fixed and temporary Queues are known > on the two instances and used on the two physical servers, by all 4 > processes > > Then, I tried to use an embedded VM protocol on the client and server > process. I use a vm transport locally and a tcp network transport between > client and server. > > In this case, the message generated on the fixed queue is received by the > server instance (on the second physical server), but the answer can't be > sent. I have an JMS exception on the server which says that the temporary > queue created on the client doesn't exist on the server. > > javax.jms.JMSException: Cannot publish to a deleted Destination: > temp-queue://ID:ytsvmx01s-54908-1201021101082-4:0:77 > > When I use the internal web-site on client, I can see the temporary queue > referenced by the exception. > BrokerName=ytsvmx01s,Type=Subscription,persistentMode=Non-Durable,destinationType=TempQueue,destinationName=ID_ytsvmx01s-54908-1201021101082-4_0_76,clientId=ID_ytsvmx01s-54908-1201021101082-5_0,consumerId=ID_ytsvmx01s-54908-1201021101082-4_0_77_1 > > > On server, the temporary queues don't exist. > > I use ActiveMQ 4.1 > > Anyone has an idea ? > > Thank you > Eric-AWL. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Embedded-broker%22%2C-%22network-of-brokers%22-and-%22temporary-queues%22-tp15023996s2354p15024677.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
