Hi,
Its still the same issue in 5.0 by the looks of things:

http://www.nabble.com/file/p14418496/AMQ5.0_dump.html AMQ5.0_dump.html 

100% is being spent in readInt()

Would you expect alot of time to be spent in this method in the first place
or is this completely unexpected? Has you/anyone ever seen seen this before?
Its always the case on my RCP application so it tried to reproduce it with
simple MDP consumer using spring. In this simple test, I was sending 1
message every second and when receiving it with MDP, I had an empty for loop
1 million times to try to chew up CPU. On reading the profile, AMQ was still
93% of the application. This may not be so b

Does anyone know what to try from here?
Thanks
/Tom



rajdavies wrote:
> 
> This looks like it might be a bug - but ActiveMQ 5.0 is now available  
> - please give it a try ;)
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:57 AM, TOPPER_HARLEY wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>> Im running an eclipse RCP application that uses AMQ4.1.1 for  
>> receiving data
>> from temp queues(request/response) and topics (for updates). We are  
>> having
>> trouble with CPU on client side and from using YourKit profiler to  
>> monitor
>> this over about 16 hours I see that AMQ is 100% of the time.  
>> According to
>> the snapshot attached, my methods are completely negligible. Here is  
>> a quick
>> snippet:
>>
>> <All threads>
>> 318,332,979  java.lang.Thread.run()  100 %
>>    318,003,121  org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run()  
>> 100 %
>>        317,369,872
>> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand() 100 %
>>            317,369,747
>> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(DataInput) 100 %
>>                317,369,747  java.io.DataInputStream.readInt()  100%
>>
>> Generated by YourKit Java Profiler 7.1 EAP build 3004    19-Dec-2007
>> 10:19:15
>>
>> This seems strange since its an RCP application with glazed lists  
>> etc. I
>> would have thought that my methods (or at least eclipse/glazed lists  
>> would
>> be chewing up the CPU). But from this it seems to be AMQ.
>>
>> Does anyone have any thoughts on this or am I reading this data  
>> incorrectly?
>>
>> Thanks for any input
>>
>> /Tom
>>
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p14414902/client_dump.html client_dump.html
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-100--of-CPU-in-RCP-application-tp14414902s2354p14414902.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-100--of-CPU-in-RCP-application-tp14414902s2354p14418496.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to