Hi, Are you able to replicate this issue consistently?
If yes, then can you tell me how to simulate this issue. Thanks Gnanaprakash Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) wrote: > > Hello Active MQ users/developers , > Our application uses non persistent > embedded broker ,durable subscribers , topic publishers . The active mq > version is 4.1.1(release version). There are two topic publishers and > two durable subscribers respectively. > In your previous responses, you specified that for durable subscribers > active mq maintains a queue of messages (Message Queue). For each of > the durable subscribers, a queue of references is maintained , the > references point to the messages stored in Message Queue. > Are these queues maintained in RAM or on the disk ? > There is TTL of 5 minutes on all the messages. > What is the behavior if the messages are not consumed after 5 minutes > ? There is JIRA issue AMQ-1112 (Messages still exist after TTL). Will > the messages keep accumulating in the message queue and the > corresponding references in the individual queues ? > > if this is the case will active mq occupy a lot of disk space.? > > The active mq data folder is always around (40.7-40.8 MB). > > This issue is fixed in 5.0 snap shot, cannot upgrade to snap shot > version, as Iam not sure how stable it is. We are going into production > next month. > > Please let me know, as to what can be done in this regard. Would > switching to non durable subscribers solve the problem ? > > is there a tool which I can use for browsing through active mq's > Message Queues ? > > thanks, > Suchitha. > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/active-mq-%28message-expiration%29-tp12247012s2354p14374044.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.