Ok, yestery I already changed the dependency to activemq-5.0.0 and deployed one application on the test-system. other (remote) applications on the test-system are still running activemq-4.1.1, but AFAICS the communication between 5.0.0 and 4.1.1 was fine - no problems.
Now we plan to upgrade our production applications to 5.0.0 tomorrow, so hopefully I can tell you more in 2 or 3 days, if we still encounter the duplicate messages. Thanx for now, cheers, Martin On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 20:48 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Not sure. But I'd also recommend you move on to the 5.0.0 release. > > On Dec 16, 2007 6:50 PM, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I will change this. Might this be the reason for the duplicate > > messages? > > > > Cheers, > > Martin > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 13:42 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > Nope.. The broker name also has to be different. Have them connect > > > with something like vm://brokera and vm://brokerb > > > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 8:16 AM, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > because I just read this in another thread: > > > > > > > > > Also make sure the all the brokers have unique broker names. > > > > > > > > I forgot to mention, that we have two web applications (contexts) > > > > running in one tomcat, and both with a broker. ConnectionFactories in > > > > both apps connect to them both with brokerUrl "vm://localhost". > > > > > > > > Via jmx I can see, that two brokers exist, with different BrokerIds. > > > > > > > > Is this ok so far, or might it be a possible reason for the strange > > > > behavior? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:04 +0100, Martin Grotzke wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > currently we have the issue of messages, that are sent again at server > > > > > restart on our production system. Unfortunately, on the test-system > > > > > this > > > > > is not reproducable. > > > > > > > > > > I have seen, that in this mailing list and in the issue tracker this > > > > > issue has been already discussed several times, but I couldn't find > > > > > anything that might help to track down this issue. > > > > > > > > > > So what are we doing? We are using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 with the jvm > > > > > transport > > > > > embedded within a tomcat and configured via spring. > > > > > > > > > > Mhh, more details you find below: configuration, producer, consumer, > > > > > logs. So is anything wrong with this? Is it ok to use one session for > > > > > two message listeners (to the same backend)? Should we use > > > > > transactions? > > > > > Should we use AativeMQ 5? > > > > > Or what else might be the reason for the problem? > > > > > > > > > > Thanx a lot in advance, > > > > > cheers, > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And now the details... > > > > > > > > > > The broker (spring) configuration looks like this: > > > > > > > > > > <bean id="broker" class="org.apache.activemq.xbean.BrokerFactoryBean"> > > > > > <property name="config" value="classpath:activemq.xml" /> > > > > > <property name="start" value="true" /> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > activemq.xml: > > > > > <beans> > > > > > <bean > > > > > class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"/> > > > > > <broker xmlns="http://activemq.org/config/1.0"; > > > > > brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="/tmp/activemq/data"> > > > > > <managementContext> > > > > > <managementContext jmxDomainName="foo.message" /> > > > > > </managementContext> > > > > > </broker> > > > > > </beans> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The jmsTemplate and connectionFactory configuration is the following: > > > > > > > > > > <bean id="jmsTemplate" > > > > > class="org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate" scope="singleton"> > > > > > <constructor-arg><ref bean="poolingJmsFactory" > > > > > /></constructor-arg> > > > > > <property name="deliveryPersistent" value="true" /> > > > > > <property name="pubSubDomain" value="true"/> > > > > > <property name="defaultDestinationName" value="default"/> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > <bean id="poolingJmsFactory" > > > > > class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" > > > > > destroy-method="stop" > > > > > scope="singleton" depends-on="broker"> > > > > > <property name="connectionFactory"> > > > > > <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="brokerURL"><value>vm://localhost</value></property> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="useAsyncSend"><value>false</value></property> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="optimizeAcknowledge"><value>false</value></property> > > > > > <property name="objectMessageSerializationDefered" > > > > > value="true" /> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > </property> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The producer code looks like this, using the jmsTemplate shown above: > > > > > > > > > > public void sendSomeMessage ( final SomeSerializable > > > > > someSerializable ) { > > > > > _jmsTemplate.send( Topics.TOPIC_1, new SomeMessageCreator() { > > > > > public Message createMessage( Session session ) throws > > > > > JMSException { > > > > > final ObjectMessage result = session.createObjectMessage( > > > > > someSerializable ); > > > > > // here is used a property that is later used for > > > > > selecting messages, > > > > > // perhaps this isn't really required...? > > > > > result.setStringProperty( > > > > > MessageProperties.EVENT_TYPE.name(), Topics.TOPIC_1.name() ); > > > > > return result; > > > > > }); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the consumer side we have a "MessageListenerContainer", that sets > > > > > up > > > > > several message listeners. Its configuration and the configuration of > > > > > the connection factory is this: > > > > > > > > > > <bean id="messageListenerContainer" > > > > > > > > > > class="com.freiheit.shopping24.shop.message.business.impl.MessageListenerContainer" > > > > > destroy-method="shutdown" scope="singleton"> > > > > > <constructor-arg ref="listenerConnectionFactory" /> > > > > > <constructor-arg> > > > > > <bean class="foo.Action1" /> > > > > > <bean class="foo.Action2" /> > > > > > <bean class="foo.Action3" /> > > > > > <bean class="foo.Action4" /> > > > > > </constructor-arg> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > <bean id="listenerConnectionFactory" > > > > > class="org.apache.activemq.spring.ActiveMQConnectionFactory" > > > > > scope="singleton" depends-on="broker"> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="brokerURL"><value>vm://localhost</value></property> > > > > > <property name="alwaysSessionAsync"><value>true</value></property> > > > > > <property name="dispatchAsync"><value>false</value></property> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="optimizeAcknowledge"><value>false</value></property> > > > > > <property > > > > > name="optimizedMessageDispatch"><value>true</value></property> > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > The MessageListenerContainer looks like the following: > > > > > > > > > > class MessageListenerContainer { > > > > > > > > > > private Connection _connection; > > > > > > > > > > MessageListenerContainer ( > > > > > final ConnectionFactory listenerConnectionFactory, > > > > > final Action1 action1, > > > > > final Action2 action2, > > > > > final Action3 action3, > > > > > final Action4 action4 ) { > > > > > > > > > > try { > > > > > _connection = > > > > > listenerConnectionFactory.createConnection(); > > > > > _connection.setClientID( "some-client-id" ); > > > > > > > > > > // two sessions for two different backends > > > > > final Session session1 = _connection.createSession( > > > > > false, Session.CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE ); > > > > > final Session session2 = _connection.createSession( > > > > > false, Session.CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE ); > > > > > > > > > > // send event1 to backend1 and backend2 > > > > > registerEventAndAction( session1, Topics.TOPIC_1, > > > > > action1.getClass().getSimpleName(), > > > > > new SomeMessageListener( action1 ) ); > > > > > registerEventAndAction( session2, Topics.TOPIC_1, > > > > > action2.getClass().getSimpleName(), > > > > > new SomeMessageListener( action2 ) ); > > > > > > > > > > // send event2 to backend1 and backend2 > > > > > registerEventAndAction( session1, Topics.TOPIC_2, > > > > > action3.getClass().getSimpleName(), > > > > > new SomeOtherMessageListener( action1 ) ); > > > > > registerEventAndAction( session2, Topics.TOPIC_2, > > > > > action4.getClass().getSimpleName(), > > > > > new SomeOtherMessageListener( action2 ) ); > > > > > > > > > > _connection.start(); > > > > > } catch ( JMSException e ) { > > > > > LOG.fatal( "Could not start MessageListenerContainer.", e > > > > > ); > > > > > throw new RuntimeException( "Could not start > > > > > MessageListenerContainer", e ); > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > private void registerEventAndAction( Session session, > > > > > Topics topic, > > > > > String actionName, > > > > > MessageListener messageListener ) { > > > > > try { > > > > > // here we have the selector on the property EVENT_TYPE > > > > > with the name of > > > > > // the Topics enum, but I don't know if we really need > > > > > this - a colleague has > > > > > // written this ;-) > > > > > TopicSubscriber subscriber = > > > > > session.createDurableSubscriber( topic, topic.name() + "-" + > > > > > actionName, MessageProperties.EVENT_TYPE + "=\'" > > > > > + topic.name() + "\'", false ); > > > > > subscriber.setMessageListener( messageListener ); > > > > > } catch ( JMSException e ) { > > > > > LOG.fatal( "Could not create subscriber.", e ); > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > public void shutdown () { > > > > > if ( _connection != null ) { > > > > > try { > > > > > _connection.close(); > > > > > } catch ( JMSException e ) { > > > > > LOG.error( "Could not stop JMS connection.", e ); > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > The message listeners look like this: > > > > > > > > > > public final class SomeMessageListener implements MessageListener { > > > > > > > > > > private static final Log LOG = LogFactory.getLog( > > > > > SomeMessageListener.class ); > > > > > > > > > > private final SomeAction _action; > > > > > > > > > > public SomeMessageListener(SomeAction action) { > > > > > _action = action; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > public void onMessage( Message message ) { > > > > > LOG.info( "Got message " + message ); > > > > > final SomeSerializable someSerializable; > > > > > try { > > > > > someSerializable = (SomeSerializable) > > > > > ((ObjectMessage)message).getObject(); > > > > > _action.performProductListAction( details ); > > > > > message.acknowledge(); > > > > > LOG.info( "Received message acknowledged." ); > > > > > } catch ( JMSException e ) { > > > > > LOG.fatal( "Could not acknowledge message.", e ); > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Exactly these message are printed in the logs when the server is > > > > > restarted many messages, and not only for one message, but for 1000 or > > > > > 2000 for the last 6 days (the server was restarted 6 days before). > > > > > > > > > > The logs related to messaging when the server starts: > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.getBroker: > > > > > ActiveMQ 4.1.1 JMS Message Broker (localhost) is starting > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.getBroker: > > > > > For help or more information please see: > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/ > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] JMX connector > > > > > org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext.run: > > > > > > > > > > JMX consoles can connect to > > > > > service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.JDBCPersistenceAdapter.createAdapter: > > > > > Database driver recognized: [apache_derby_embedded_jdbc_driver] > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.DefaultDatabaseLocker.start: > > > > > Attempting to acquire the exclusive lock to become the Master broker > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.DefaultDatabaseLocker.start: > > > > > Becoming the master on dataSource: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter.recover: > > > > > Journal Recovery Started from: Active Journal: using 2 x 20.0 Megs > > > > > at: /tmp/activemq/data/journal > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter.recover: > > > > > Journal Recovered: 1 message(s) in transactions recovered. > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.start: > > > > > ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker (localhost, > > > > > ID:portal02.shopping25.easynet.de-55403-1197562278985-1:0) started > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > com.freiheit.shopping24.shop.message.business.impl.MessageServiceImpl.<init>: > > > > > Creating MessageService... > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main > > > > > com.freiheit.shopping24.shop.message.business.impl.MessageListenerContainer.<init>: > > > > > Creating MessageListenerContainer, registering message listeners... > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnector.start: > > > > > Connector vm://localhost Started > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] main org.apache.activemq.kaha.impl.KahaStore.delete: > > > > > Kaha Store deleted data directory > > > > > /www/freiheit/data/activemq/data/tmp_storage > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] ActiveMQ Session Task foo.SomeMessageListener.onMessage: > > > > > Got message ActiveMQObjectMessage {commandId = 7, responseRequired = > > > > > true, > > > > > messageId = ID:fqdn-42897-1196946608950-3:795:1:1:3, > > > > > originalDestination = null, > > > > > originalTransactionId = null, producerId = > > > > > ID:fqdn-42897-1196946608950-3:795:1:1, > > > > > destination = topic://TOPIC_1, transactionId = null, expiration = 0, > > > > > timestamp = 1197048729937, > > > > > arrival = 0, correlationId = null, replyTo = null, persistent = true, > > > > > type = null, > > > > > priority = 4, groupID = null, groupSequence = 0, targetConsumerId = > > > > > null, compressed = false, > > > > > userID = null, content = [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > > > > marshalledProperties = [EMAIL PROTECTED], dataStr > > > > > ucture = null, redeliveryCounter = 0, size = 1208, properties = > > > > > {EVENT_TYPE=TOPIC_1}, > > > > > readOnlyProperties = true, readOnlyBody = true, droppable = false} > > > > > > > > > > [INFO ] ActiveMQ Session Task foo.SomeMessageListener.onMessage: > > > > > Received message acknowledged. > > > > > > > > > > And lots more log messages like the last two... > > > > > > > > > > Wow, you really have reached this point, thanx a lot! :) > > > > > So is there anything wrong? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Martin Grotzke > > > > http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Martin Grotzke > > http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ > > > > > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
