We had the same problems using AMQ-4.0.2 as well. We were able to reduce them by applying the patch described in https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-961, which only seems to have been applied to trunk, but not yet to the 4.1.x branch.
Regards, Holger Steven Dalton-2 wrote: > > > I've also tried to a get a network of brokers running using activemq > 4.1.1. > > The messages send and receive fine until I start taking down and > bringing back up the brokers. The connections between the brokers are > not re-established. > > I have been watching this list for a while and have noticed a number of > people with the same problem but no solutions have been put forward. > > I consider this feature critical to the use of the product. > > Steven > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Boyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 19 November 2007 3:53 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: [BULK] Re: Network of brokers > Importance: Low > > > I too am very interested in finding some case studies or at least > experiences > that other folks have recently had with Network of Brokers config/use. > If > this works, it would suit our needs well. However, I have been having > various problems with it. > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > LikeEvents wrote: >> >> Can someone point me to a case study of having a cluster of brokers. >> I want to put lets say a set of brokers in a cluster in one data > center >> and similarly in others. >> >> How does persistence work in ActiveMQ 5.0, can you have durable > messaging >> without a database in the backend. (Through replication.) >> >> >> When is Active MQ 5.0 supposed to be released. >> Thanks >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13828016 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Network-of-brokers-tf4833130s2354.html#a13834429 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
