Hi all After problems with Master/Slave configuration over MySQL when master broker hangs up after some time, we decided to switch to the Network of Brokers to achieve HA
I setup 2 brokers on 61616 and 61716 ports with following configs <pre> <beans> <!-- Allows us to use system properties as variables in this configuration file --> <bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"/> <broker brokerName="localhost" useJmx="false" xmlns="http://activemq.org/config/1.0" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"> <transportConnectors> <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://localhost:61716"/> </transportConnectors> <networkConnectors> <networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://localhost:61616)"/> </networkConnectors> </broker> </beans> </pre> Second one is the same just symmetrical port numbers. After that I wrote in Connection pool I'm using for both sending and receiving messages jms.remotehost.uri=failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61716) <pre> <bean id="jmsConnectionFactory" class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" init-method="start" destroy-method="stop" depends-on="jmsBroker"> <property name="connectionFactory"> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> <property name="brokerURL" value="${jms.remotehost.uri}" /> <property name="redeliveryPolicy"> <bean class="org.apache.activemq.RedeliveryPolicy"> <property name="backOffMultiplier" value="3"/> <property name="useExponentialBackOff" value="true"/> <property name="maximumRedeliveries" value="11"></property> <property name="initialRedeliveryDelay" value="2000"></property> </bean> </property> </bean> </property> </bean> </pre> As a result, only messages that are sent to one of the queues get consumed, The question is how can it be fixed the best way. All I need is HA for message queue, but I'd also like both brokers work effectively when they are up, The only solution I see is declare two connection factories, but that is extensive way since i will need to duplicate a lot of things, is there any better way? Thanks in advance for any answers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Running-a-HA-network-of-brokers-tf4360281s2354.html#a12426843 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.