Hi,
I am sure this is a silly configuration issue on my part, but I can't
figure it out.
I am using activemq 4.1.1 on Vista. I basically have two queues, one
called submitted-items, and another called completed-items.
JVM1 takes items from completed-items, and does some work with them.
This JVM also runs the embedded broker with a TCP connector. I have a
configurable number of sessions sharing the same connection which
performs this work.
In JVM2, I have a worker process which take items from the
submitted-items queue, and potentially generate new messages on both the
submitted-items and completed-items queue. There is also a configurable
number of sessions sharing the same connection which performs this work.
This all works fine, regardless if JVM1 and JVM2 are on the same machine
or not.
If I try to run JVM3, which runs the same code as JVM2, while I can see
it connects to the broker (confirmed with debug), it receives no
notifications for items on the submitted-items queue.
If I kill JVM2, then JVM3 immediately receives new message notifications.
If I start up JVM2 again, it sits there receiving no new messages. If I
kill JVM3, then JVM2 starts to receive messages again.
So connectivity works - but somehow during message dispatch, only one
JVM (connection) is being selected for items in submitted-items queue.
I have set all prefetch limits to 1, and have created the broker as follows:
BrokerService broker = new BrokerService();
broker.setPersistent(false);
broker.setUseJmx(false);
broker.deleteAllMessages();
broker.addConnector(CONNECTION_URL);
broker.start();
Connections for all JMS clients are created like:
ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory =
new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(CONNECTION_URL);
ActiveMQPrefetchPolicy prefetchPolicy = new ActiveMQPrefetchPolicy();
prefetchPolicy.setAll(1);
connectionFactory.setPrefetchPolicy(prefetchPolicy);
Connection connection = connectionFactory.createConnection();
connection.start();
All messages are received using the onMessage() style.
I know I probably haven't posted enough code - but is there an obvious
reason why this might be happening? Thanks in advance.
--
Cheers,
David
Nuix Pty Ltd
Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699
Web: http://www.nuix.com Fax: +61 2 9212 6902
