with failover:// did you set the randomize property to false ? Its
probable your local machine wasn't being picked
On Jul 10, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Jiang wrote:
James:
Whether 'static' schema is not supported also? Last time I tried
'failover', but I find it was slow some way.(I configured 3
brokers , one
was my machine. I run the client code on my machine. I used
'failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,...)' in my opinion it should find
localhost in a short time , but from the test result , it was more
slower
than what I expected.)
James.Strachan wrote:
Yeah - or use failover...
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
On 7/9/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Must be out-dated documentation. I don't think list is a valid
transport
scheme. You could try the static transport scheme.
Jiang wrote:
I config 3 brokers . In the client code , I use uri as
"list:tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://192.168.1.110:61616,tcp://
192.168.1.112:61616"
. But when I start the code , it throw "Transport scheme NOT
recognized:
[list]" . From the docs, I find list: is valid for multi brokers
connection
. Why ?
Any help is welcome .
thanks
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/why-can-not-
connect-to-the-brokers-tf4039601s2354.html#a11515312
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
'Go further faster with Apache Camel!'
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
