Are you using the same version of jars on the client and broker?
On 5/2/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everybody, I have running a Master/Slave. Sending messages to the master without persistence(DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT) everything works fine. Changing the delivery mode to "DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT" I get the following exception: ERROR MasterBroker - Slave Failed java.lang.AssertionError: Unsupported Method at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.request(TransportSuppo rt.java:71) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.request(TransportFilter .java:88) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.request(TransportFilter .java:88) at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.request(MutexTransport.j ava:54) at org.apache.activemq.broker.ft.MasterBroker.sendSyncToSlave(MasterBrok er.java:363) at org.apache.activemq.broker.ft.MasterBroker.sendToSlave(MasterBroker.j ava:333) at org.apache.activemq.broker.ft.MasterBroker.send(MasterBroker.java:307 ) at org.apache.activemq.broker.MutableBrokerFilter.send(MutableBrokerFilt er.java:136) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processMessage(Transpo rtConnection.java:498) at org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQMessage.visit(ActiveMQMessage.jav a:604) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConne ction.java:294) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportC onnection.java:185) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFilt er.java:65) at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(WireForm atNegotiator.java:133) at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand(InactivityM onitor.java:122) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSup port.java:84) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java: 137) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) I take the Master/Slave activemq.xml from the "org.apache.activemq.broker.ft". Is it even possible to use persistence Mode? It should be I think. Greets Goldi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slaver-persistent--tf3681637s2354.html#a10289475 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/