nlif wrote:
> Thanks, James.
> 
> Yes, I'm also inclined to think it's a class loader issue. But then, how
> come it doesn't happen all the time?
> What may cause it to load another version of the class only some of the
> times?
> Does ActiveMQ do anything... um, unconventional with class-loading?
> 
> Thanks,
> Naaman
> 
> 
> James.Strachan wrote:
>> If you get a ClassCastException yet the object seems to be of the
>> correct class name, then it looks like a class loader issue (multiple
>> versions of the same class on the classpath). Otherwise if it was a
>> serialization issue, you wouldn't get an object you can inspect.
>>
> 

Is it a vm broker?

-- 
Christopher G. Stach II

Reply via email to