nlif wrote: > Thanks, James. > > Yes, I'm also inclined to think it's a class loader issue. But then, how > come it doesn't happen all the time? > What may cause it to load another version of the class only some of the > times? > Does ActiveMQ do anything... um, unconventional with class-loading? > > Thanks, > Naaman > > > James.Strachan wrote: >> If you get a ClassCastException yet the object seems to be of the >> correct class name, then it looks like a class loader issue (multiple >> versions of the same class on the classpath). Otherwise if it was a >> serialization issue, you wouldn't get an object you can inspect. >> >
Is it a vm broker? -- Christopher G. Stach II