That is simple enough :). I had assumed from the documentation that since master/slave didn't mention memory persistence that is was only possible with jdbcPersistence or a shared file system.
Thanks. Franz rajdavies wrote: > > > yes it should - just set the persistence to false in the > configuration: see http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html - > last item. When persistence is false, the ActiveMQ broker uses an in > memory store implementation instead > > cheers, > > Rob > > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > On 27 Apr 2007, at 06:25, Franz Garsombke wrote: > >> >> We are setting up a master/slave configuration with ActiveMQ. Our >> object-relational-mapping framework uses a topic to synchronize cache >> changes across VMs. These messages do not need to be persisted into a >> database or file store. I was wondering if a master/slave broker >> configuration could be set up that didn't need the JDBC persistence >> adapter? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Franz Garsombke >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave- >> Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10213401 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-Configuration-with-Memory-Persistence--tf3655809s2354.html#a10219398 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
