On 3/6/07 7:28 PM, "rabidgremlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would there be a separate buffer per connection ? > > Otherwise a broken listener would still cause all the others to block... > > Also with the current release would a slow listener cause all the other > listeners to slow down because it is not clearing messages from the buffer > fast enough ? FWIW, this is a JMS flow control issue rather than ActiveMQ specific. I have the identical issues with SonicMQ, for example. They have the same "strategy" that Hiram describes below. > > Thanks > > Jonathan > > > On 3/7/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> In the next major version (trunk branch) we have made some major >> strides in this area so that messages just go to disk on your senario >> instead of being buffered in memory. But all buffers (even ones on >> disks) have limits and will eventually be reached. So you have to >> detect dead clients anyways to avoid running out of disk space. >> -- Daryl http://itsallsemantics.com "We want great men who, when fortune frowns, will not be discouraged." -- Colonel Henry Knox, 1776
