For lots of stuff I just use JSP's built-in mechanisms. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara < maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer SM. You should consider that both use different approaches: > 1. tiles uses composition pattern. > 2. SM decoration pattern instead. > > SM needs to wrap every response, in order to decorate them, and after > sends output to browser. So if one of your goals is performance or > even you need to handle big outputs, SM is not the best choice. > > 2010/11/26 Volker Karlmeier <vol...@magiccode.eu>: > > I prefer tiles :) > > > > Am 26.11.2010 um 08:55 schrieb webmeiker <i...@webmeiker.com>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Based on your experience, what do you consider the “best” technology for > >> layout in Struts2? > >> > >> Do you recommend me Sitemesh, Tiles2 or what? > >> > >> > >> > >> (Personally, I think the latest should be the “best”, because it’s > developed > >> with improvement over similar/current technologies in mind. But this is > a > >> debateable question.) > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> -- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Maurizio Cucchiara > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
