Francisco José Aquino García wrote:
2009/7/1 Dale Newfield <d...@newfield.org>:
May I ask why you need to dynamically change the buffer size?
to use the filesystem block size where the thumbnail resides as the
bufferSize, as different thumbnails may reside in different
filesystems
That sounds like a reasonable motivation. Unfortunately as we've
previously discussed, the current stream result object won't support
dynamic values for this. An evil workaround could be to configure a
bunch of nearly identical results "success-stream-512",
"success-stream-1024", "success-stream-8192", etc. and dispatch to the
appropriate one. A better solution would be to modify the stream
result. Patches are welcome to change that, and if you're quick (and if
you smile sweetly at Musachy) you might be able to get that change into
2.1.8...
That's it. I didn't think very much about it really, I'm not an expert
in Java IO so maybe this makes not much sense (the same goes for using
BufferedInputStream instead of just the default InputStream.)
BufferedInputStream adds much more complexity and probably isn't
necessary, but as long as it works...
-Dale
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
