Thanks to all replies!  I really appreciated all replies all are really
helpful and informative.

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Gabriel Belingueres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Pros:
> Easy to learn and start with (some free books available.)
> Great community (mailing list.)
> Very extensible.
>
> Cons:
> Sporadic releases.
> Javascript validation framework is very limited for non ajax apps.
> Multiple rendering technologies make their component model hard to
> modify or extends (parallel class hierarchies for both components and
> tags, and component's HTML code and styles are tied to a particular
> theme.)
>
> 2008/11/7 Néstor Boscán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Ryan
> >
> > In my experience:
> >
> > Pros:
> >
> > 1.- Form mapping!!!. Yes form mapping in Struts 1 is horrible.
> > 2.- Conversion support
> > 3.- Interceptor support
> > 4.- Better AJAX Support
> > 5.- Lightweight vs JSF
> >
> > The framework is very flexible and you can adjust it to your needs.
> >
> > Cons:
> >
> > 1.- Themes. They make the framework harder to understand and slower, and
> to
> > me adds little value.
> > 2.- Validation is OK, but need better validation support like validation
> of
> > list items. And the ability to validate a specific Action method in a
> > straightforward way. Better JavaScript support.
> > 3.- Struts 2 Tags should be more flexible.
> > So there it is.
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:18 PM, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Can anyone share to me some of the things you like about
> >> Struts 2 as well some of the things you don't like about struts 2?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
warmest regards,
Ryan Webb - Philippines

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to