Indeed. The conversion errors are set on the "fake" stack, and are never
copied back to the original stack.

musachy

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:46 AM, David Harland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I know the feeling ;0)
>
> Dave.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Struts 2.0.12 has broken Conversion Errors!!!
> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 3:44 PM
> > Attention Deficit Disorder + Multi-tasking = bad emails
> >
> > :)
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM, David Harland
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > 2.0.11.1 works. 2.0.12 does not.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Musachy Barroso
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Subject: Re: Struts 2.0.12 has broken Conversion
> > Errors!!!
> > > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
> > <user@struts.apache.org>,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 3:32 PM
> > > > Are you sure abut this? I am running 2.0.11.1 on
> > the test
> > > > case that you
> > > > mentioned, and the conversion errors are added to
> > the
> > > > "fieldErrors" map on
> > > > the action. Please note that the action must
> > implement
> > > > ValidationAware,
> > > > otherwise the errors will do get lost.
> > > >
> > > > musachy
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Musachy Barroso
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reporting, I will look into it.
> > > > >
> > > > > musachy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:55 AM, David
> > Harland
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Done.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Nils-Helge Garli
> > Hegvik
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > From: Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Struts 2.0.12 has
> > broken
> > > > Conversion Errors!!!
> > > > >> > To: "Struts Users Mailing
> > List"
> > > > <user@struts.apache.org>,
> > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008,
> > 11:49 AM
> > > > >> > Hi!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > If you have found a bug, please
> > register an
> > > > issue in JIRA
> > > > >> > and include
> > > > >> > as much relevant information as
> > possible.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#issues
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Nils-H
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM,
> > David
> > > > Harland
> > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > Since upgrading to struts
> > 2.0.12 from
> > > > 2.0.11.1 all
> > > > >> > conversion errors are being lost.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Here is a simple example
> > showing this is
> > > > broken!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Take the Struts2 blank app for
> > 2.0.11.1.
> > > > Now add a
> > > > >> > simple Action with an Integer
> > property
> > > > testNumber. Now add a
> > > > >> > jsp with a field testNumber. Now
> > put fred in
> > > > testNumber and
> > > > >> > submit.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > You get 'Invalid field
> > value for
> > > > field
> > > > >> > "testNumber".'
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Now replace the lib files from
> > the
> > > > 2.0.11.1 struts2
> > > > >> > blank with the 2.0.12.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The Conversion errors now do
> > not get
> > > > displayed. They
> > > > >> > are lost!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > It appears to be the
> > > > ParametersInterceptor is taking a
> > > > >> > copy of the ValueStack, the
> > conversion errors
> > > > are being set
> > > > >> > on the new stack and therefore
> > lost.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > David.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > > For additional commands,
> > e-mail:
> > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry
> > the
> > > > stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the
> > stone?"
> > > > Pink Floyd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?"
> > Pink Floyd
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

Reply via email to