You're probably not editing the log4j config that is picked up at
runtime. Maybe your server has it's own config (since you're saying
that log4j is in the appserver classpath)?

Nils-H

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:47 PM, 928572663 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to reduce the amount of struts logging?
>
>
> 928572663 wrote:
>>
>> I have a log4j.xml file located in my /src directory in my webapp (Dynamic
>> Web Project from eclipse ganymede).
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <!DOCTYPE log4j:configuration SYSTEM "log4j.dtd">
>> <log4j:configuration xmlns:log4j="http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/";>
>>   <appender name="stdout" class="org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender">
>>      <layout class="org.apache.log4j.TTCCLayout" />
>>   </appender>
>>
>>   <!-- log detail configuration -->
>>   <logger name="com.opensymphony.xwork2">
>>      <level value="error" />
>>      <appender-ref ref="stdout" />
>>   </logger>
>>   <logger name="org.apache.struts2">
>>      <level value="error" />
>>      <appender-ref ref="stdout" />
>>   </logger>
>>   <logger name="freemarker">
>>      <level value="warn" />
>>      <appender-ref ref="stdout" />
>>   </logger>
>>   <root>
>>      <level value="error" />
>>      <appender-ref ref="stdout" />
>>   </root>
>> </log4j:configuration>
>>
>> I've got log4j.jar  in my appserver's classpath.  It looks like I'm
>> getting everything in the stdout console - mostly DEBUG messages.  As far as
>> I can tell log4j is not filtering anything out.
>>
>> -John
>>
>>
>> Martin Gainty wrote:
>>>
>>> you'll need to be more specific about which categories of messages you
>>> want to log File? SMTP? JDBC? categories are listed:
>>>
>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/Appender.html
>>>
>>> you'll also need to be specific about which level of messages you want
>>> and dont want
>>>
>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/Category.html#setLevel
>>>
>>> where ALL means everything including any/all messages you categorise as
>>> obnoxious
>>> OFF turns off all logging
>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/Level.html
>>>
>>> Provide more specifics if you want specific help on operational
>>> characteristics, code and or environment for log4j
>>>
>>> Martin ______________________________________________ Disclaimer and
>>> confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates
>>> to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential
>>> nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than
>>> intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained
>>> within this transmission.
>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:09:43 -0700
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Tons of Could not find property messages - log4j is not
>>>> helping?
>>>>
>>>> Wow, I have no idea where you're going with this.  So far you've shown
>>>> code
>>>> that can write more messages to a log and find out the name of the log
>>>> file.  How does this help in turning off the obnoxious messages that the
>>>> framework is logging that aren't in the obvious categories?
>>>>  (*Chris*)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> very good dave..
>>>>>
>>>>> assuming your log4j configuration has a FILELOG appender
>>>>>
>>>>>   <appender name="FILELOG"
>>>>> class="org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender">
>>>>>
>>>>> //Logger extends Category so use getAppender to get the Apender object
>>>>> Appender appender=log.getAppender("FILELOG");
>>>>> //finally to get the actual name of the log
>>>>> String NameOfLogFile=appender.fileName;
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Martin
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> Disclaimer and confidentiality note
>>>>> Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official
>>>>> business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and
>>>>> Sender
>>>>> does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended
>>>>> recipient.
>>>>> Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this
>>>>> transmission.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:55:18 -0700
>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tons of Could not find property messages - log4j is not
>>>>>
>>>>> helping?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- On Fri, 10/17/08, Chris Pratt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm, I don't get it Martin, how does writing something
>>>>>>> to the log prevent things from getting written to the log?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reverse psychology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!20EE04FBC541789!167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008<http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns%2120EE04FBC541789%21167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how.
>>>
>>> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!20EE04FBC541789!167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to