Al-

Any pointers you can share on porting ?

M-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] What do you code today?


> http://www.enterprise-password-safe.com/
>
> At the moment the code is under a major overhaul to use S2.1 (yes, 2.1)
and
> add some new features, hence my big interest in 2.1 :).
>
> Al.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:14 PM
> Subject: [OT] What do you code today?
>
>
> > While outward facing web application get the most publicity, I know
> > that most of us are heads-down on internally-facing applications
> > designed for fellow employees to use over the corporate intranet.
> >
> > I'm trying to put together a list of the typical types of applications
> > that  enterprise developer write in real life. For example, my last
> > project involved a system to track drafting, granting, monitoring, and
> > enforcing water permits administered by a government agency. We would
> > create an initial record for a permit, and then add child records to
> > track progress through the workflow, and also update the master record
> > along the way. For management, a key item here is a tracking report,
> > which we exported to Word (using a third-party tool) for better
> > formatting. For engineers, a key item was a flexible search system to
> > quickly find a master or child record. Other interesting features are
> > workflows where one task leads to another. When we completed one task
> > (child record), the next is often implied, and so we had a workflow
> > that would default the next task to work on when a current task was
> > closed. Another interesting requirement was that sometimes master
> > items were merged under another uber-master-item, becoming, in effect,
> > child items themselves. In most cases, the application simply exposed
> > business models that we designed into the database, so the application
> > has little business logic of its own. Most of the workflows were
> > designed to find, list, edit, or view one database entity or the
> > other.
> >
> > So, if anyone else is up for sharing, I'd be interested in hearing
> > what sort of things other people are doing these days. (If your not
> > comfortable posting the list, feel free to mail me direct.)
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to