I've done what you have said, unfortunately without results. I still receive index.jsp:16:26: No property editor found for the bean " javax.el.ValueExpression".
Any other ideas? On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, I'm not even sure if it's possible to use the portlet > and the jsf plugin at the same time. I have not tried, but there might > be issues with it if they try to do conflicting things in the > interceptors and the results. > > > struts.xml > > > > <package name="default" extends="portlet-jsf-default" > namespace="/view"> > > > > <action name="index" class="com.mycompany.HelloAction"> > > <interceptor-ref name="basicStack"/> > > <interceptor-ref name="jsfStack"/> > > <result name="success" type="jsf"/> > > <result>/WEB-INF/jsp/view/index.jsp</result> > > </action> > > </package> > > > > A couple of things here. You're extending portlet-jsf-default, which > still has the jsfStack as the default interceptor ref. Since you have > defined a "jsf" package that extends "portlet-jsf-default", you should > probably extend the "jsf" package instead. However, it's probably just > as easy configuring the correct interceptor stack and default > interceptor ref right there in the "portlet-jsf-default" package. In > addition, you're overriding the default interceptor stack in your > action definition, so it's not really using the portletDefaultStack, > even if you had configured your default interceptor stack correctly. > Unless you need to use different interceptors in your action, there's > no need configuring those interceptor-refs there. > > You could also try swapping the order of the portletDefaultStack and > the jsfStack and see if that makes a difference. > > Nils-H > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
