<s:form>
<s:submit key="buy.key" method="buy"/>
<s:submit key="sell.key" method="sell"/> </s:form>
<action name="auction" class="my.AuctionAction">
<result>/auction.jsp</result>
</action>
public class AuctionAction {
public String buy() {
return SUCCESS;
}
public String sell() {
return SUCCESS;
}
}
Consider this code. It would be preferable to be able to write a
separate validation xml for each of the above methods. E.g.
AuctionAction-sell-validation.xml
AuctionAction-buy-validation.xml
Presently Struts 2 seems to ignore the method name if it is
non-annotated action. Are we missing something here? It seems the only
way to get this to work would be to change the jsp and struts xml as
follows:
<s:form>
<s:submit key="buy.key" action="auctionbuy" method="buy"/>
<s:submit key="sell.key" action="auctionsell" method="sell"/>
</s:form>
<action name="auction*" class="my.AuctionAction">
<result>/auction.jsp</result>
</action>
With validation named as follows:
AuctionAction-auctionsell-validation.xml
AuctionAction-auctionbuy-validation.xml
This has a downside that we have to hardcode the action alias in the JSP
which limits the reuse of a JSP that maybe used by more than one action.
-----Original Message-----
From: cilquirm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 September 2007 15:41
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas?
I'm not sure I follow how validation is more flexible when using
annotations vs. xml files.
Aliases are how you tell xwork that this method is the one to be
executed, so there's a 1-to-1 mapping between aliases and methods.
File based validation is, in a sense, more flexible, because you can
define multiple aliases against a single method and specify different
rules for each of those.
If you could provide more information regarding your situation, that
would be of great insight.
Thanks,
-a
David Harland-3 wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> It appears that if you use annotations you have more flexibilty than
> with using xml. Would it not be possible to add the abililty to
> specify validation files for each method without having to create
> aliases for every single method. We have actions with quite a high
> number of methods each wanting different validation. This can get
messy.
>
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ted Husted
> Sent: 18 September 2007 11:12
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas?
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/validation.html
>
> It's under "Defining Validation Rules" at 2. The term "alias" is used
> to refer to the action method.
>
> So if there's an actions.Register.java class with "insert" and
"update"
> action methods, then there might be XML docs like
>
> /java/actions/Register-insert-validations.xml
> /java/actions/Register-update-validations.xml
>
> One would only file for the insert method and the other only for the
> update method.
>
> The framework makes the association automatically, based on the naming
> convention, so there's nothing else to configure.
>
> In WebWork in Action, it's at page 353-354, under "Validation under
> different contexts".
>
> HTH, Ted
> <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>
>
>
> On 9/18/07, David Harland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can someone please point me to the documentation that shows you how
>> to
>
>> configure validation per action method using the validation xml
files?
>> Or is this not possible?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Ted Husted
>> Sent: 18 September 2007 10:27
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas?
>>
>> I opened
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2191
>>
>> for this, and noted the setting in the Validators documentation.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out, Veronica!
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On 8/10/07, Veronica Iturrioz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > You must to set the property validateAnnotatedMethodOnly=true, and
>> > the
>> validation occurs only for the correct methods.
>> >
>> > <interceptor-ref name="validation">
>> > true
>> > input,back,cancel,browse
>> > </interceptor-ref>
>> >
>> > but this is ok for server validation, not for client validation.
>> > Anybody know how to resolve that for client validations?
>> >
>> >
>> > Veronica.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> - ------
> ML {UFI}
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Ufi Limited
> Registered in England No. 3980770
> Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
>
> learndirect Solutions Ltd
> Registered in England No. 5081669
> Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
>
> UFI Charitable Trust
> Registered in England No. 3658378
> Registered Charity No. 1081028
> Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
>
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf424
2670.html#a12758403
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ------
ML {UFI}
______________________________________________________________________
Ufi Limited
Registered in England No. 3980770
Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
learndirect Solutions Ltd
Registered in England No. 5081669
Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
UFI Charitable Trust
Registered in England No. 3658378
Registered Charity No. 1081028
Registered Office: Dearing House, 1 Young Street, Sheffield, S1 4UP
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
