You could, but I would recommend using the *Aware interfaces in your actions. It makes them easier to test.
Nils-H On 9/11/07, j alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can do Map attibutes = ActionContext.getContext().getSession(); from an > Action - right? > > On 9/11/07, Chris Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Basically, for Actions you should use SessionAware (since you don't > > have access to the ActionContext from within a standard Action). But > > if you are writing an Interceptor, you would use ActionContext to get > > access to the Session data. > > (*Chris*) > > > > On 9/11/07, j alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > In the Struts 2 docs, it's recommended to implement SessionAware for > > > accessing session within Action, but looking at some Webwork > > documentation, > > > http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW1/SessionAware+Actions - it > > seems to > > > convey the opposite message . > > > > > > Please clarify : > > > > > > 1. Why accessing via ActionContext is not advisable ? > > > 2. In SessionAware API doc it's said " Note that using this interface > > makes > > > the Action tied to a servlet environment, so it should be avoided if > > > possible since things like unit testing will become more difficult." -- > > how > > > is it tied to servlet env, since we are not having any HTTP-specific > > code in > > > the Action but just a plain setSession(Map map) method? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Joseph > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
